Operating Partner

@import url(‘https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Urbanist:wght@300;400;500;600;700&display=swap’);

body, .entry-content, .wp-block-post-content, .wp-site-blocks, .wp-block-group, .wp-block {
font-family: “Urbanist”, system-ui, -apple-system, “Segoe UI”, Roboto, Arial, sans-serif;
}

/* Triple the white space */
.op-page section { margin: 4.5rem 0; }
.op-page h1 { margin: 0 0 1.5rem 0; }
.op-page h2 { margin: 0 0 1.25rem 0; }
.op-page h3 { margin: 2.5rem 0 0.75rem 0; }
.op-page p { margin: 0 0 1.25rem 0; max-width: 68rem; }
.op-page ul { margin: 0 0 1.5rem 1.2rem; }
.op-page li { margin: 0.5rem 0; }

/* Links as calm CTAs */
.op-page a { text-decoration: underline; text-underline-offset: 0.18em; }
.op-page .op-cta { font-weight: 600; }

Operating Partner

Partner-level operating support for funds where execution, not capital, is the constraint.

Early realism. Ownership cadence. Clean handovers.

Start a conversation

Who this is for

  • Private Equity (Nordic lower mid-market buyout & growth buyout funds):
    hands-on ownership teams where value is driven by operational execution, pace, and disciplined handovers.
  • Venture Capital (Seed to Growth):
    when founders need leverage, cadence, and faster learning as complexity rises.
  • Angels & Small Family Offices (SFOs):
    when early optimism masks execution risk and structure is needed without noise or control dynamics.

Where value is most often lost

1) At entry — mispriced complexity

Forecasts tend to underestimate complexity and overestimate delivery capacity. Deals get priced as if execution will be smoother than comparable cases suggest.

2) During ownership — execution shortfall

Even strong plans under-deliver. Large-scale studies commonly show only around half of major initiatives realise full expected value.

3) The J-curve — time works against delay

Private market funds often post negative net returns early due to fees and front-loaded costs; later gains depend on how quickly value is realised. Slow execution flattens the curve and weakens IRR.

4) At handover — momentum leakage

Transitions (deal → ownership, interim → permanent, execution → exit readiness) are where momentum often leaks unless handover is explicit and disciplined.

How I engage

Due Diligence Partner

  • Stress-test execution realism early (team, readiness, constraints).
  • Surface mispriced complexity before IC and signing.
  • Clarify the first 90–180 day operating priorities.

Working (Vice) Chair / Fractional Operating Partner

  • Establish cadence: priorities, decisions, accountability.
  • CEO sparring and board–management alignment.
  • Build capability so momentum sustains beyond the engagement.

Execution Acceleration (time-bound)

  • Simplify priorities, clear decision backlogs, restore pace.
  • Short, focused intervention with a clean exit and handover.

Sustainability (without greenwashing)

Sustainability is treated as an ownership discipline: where it materially shapes cost, regulation, asset viability, talent, and execution capacity. No branding theatre — practical decisions that hold under scrutiny.

A note on AGM / Investor Day

Some handovers are collective. AGM and Investor Day formats increasingly serve as moments to re-anchor priorities and align LPs, GPs, boards, and management.

A separate AGM / Investor Day Moderator role is available for those moments (conversation-focused), while Operating Partner work remains embedded and execution-focused.

See AGM / Investor Day Moderator

Boundaries

  • No phoenix situations or formal reconstructions.
  • No sustained high-conflict mandates.
  • Specialist referrals available where appropriate (restructuring / legal).

Opening a conversation

If you want better realism at entry, stronger cadence in ownership, and cleaner handovers that protect value, I’m happy to explore fit.

Start a conversation

Is this your new site? Log in to activate admin features and dismiss this message
Log In